Why do worker co-operatives matter?
Carl Rowlands asks why do worker co-operatives matter, and what can a future Labour government do to support them.
Why do worker co-operatives matter?
After all, there are relatively few members of worker co-operatives in the UK right now. Whilst other co-operative forms of organisation have seen an uptick in the last few years, there’s little sign of worker co-operatives becoming the important part of the economy that Labour Party policy anticipated in the 1970s and 1980s. Partly this may reflect a UK economy which has become focused on service industries. As manufacturing has declined in general, the economy has become polarised between those in positions of ownership and control, and an increasingly casualised overall workforce.
Yet we’re now approaching a turning point. The weight of the ongoing financial collapse and resulting depression has been largely borne by government, resulting in the decimation of the public sector, rendering stable employment a diminishing prospect for many parts of the UK. Only now are responses from civil society beginning to emerge, with trades union protests, and the Occupy and anti-cuts movements indicating a search for an economy which is run in the interest of wider society, rather than a lucky few.
Not only is stable, decent employment harder to find, the nature of work itself is arguably becoming less amenable to individual decision-making, as decisions are increasingly based on complex mathematical factoring and automation. If the economy plays even a minor part in determining the shape of society, politics and culture, maybe we ought to be worried. For the economy which is emerging, is one in which our labour has been effectively devalued, and where decision-making is centralised. The education system, itself increasingly based on a pay-as-you-go system, increasingly provided by private operators, produces graduates with an excess of knowledge, given the actual requirements of most private-sector employers. Already in Europe, right-wing governments are increasingly rationalising access to higher forms of education. Put bluntly, it is in excess of employer requirements.
In such an environment, worker co-operatives matter greatly. The functioning of a large worker co-op sector is perhaps the biggest single antidote to the casualised, alienated workplace experienced by so many employees. We can identify two strong reasons for backing worker co-operatives. Firstly, we are all in a time of transition. We don’t know if the current financial and economic system is sustainable in the long term. By supporting and developing worker co-operatives we can engender a ‘real-world’ existing alternative to the work being offered by a dumbed-down economy, and work to make these co-operatives sustainable in both a financial and environmental context by providing a structural, community-based approach to finance and development. In other words, worker co-ops offer radical possibilities at a time when these possibilities are in short supply. Secondly, if the economic situation merely stagnates, rather than worsens, these worker co-operatives stand to be exemplars of a new kind of business based on social responsibility and economic democracy. In this sense, it is simply the existence of a strong worker co-operative sector which will change the wider business environment. It would mean a cultural shift away from the ‘strongman’ entrepreneur, in favour of a considered approach to conflict management and the practical application of ethical considerations.
How to translate this into policy for future Labour/Co-op administrations? There are, possibly, some insights to be gained from looking at the experience of France. In 2000, the French socialist government changed the legal status of worker co-operatives, to make them easier to form, and more economically viable. This co-incided with a renewed emphasis on worker co-operatives as a vital part of regeneration, as part of a social economy based around localities (or communes). The results of these changes, and the accompanying governmental support, have been remarkable. In the last 10 years, the number of people employed by worker co-ops in France has risen from around 14,000 people to around 40,000, with particular representation in the engineering and construction sectors.
The practices of these worker co-ops might vary, yet they are, by their nature, offering a very real, and professional, economic alternative. Rather than thrown in with a ‘one-size-fits-all’ business support approach, these have sectoral-based support mechanisms, which acknowledge both their professional skills and their employee owned-and-operated status. Particularly notable are the number of co-ops which have emerged when owners bequeath their companies to their employees, upon retirement. With the necessary financial support structures, it is possible for state-backed institutions to enable and facilitate such transfers of ownership, ensuring that viable and profitable businesses are able to become co-ops and build upon existing successes.
These approaches can be connected to the formation of a National Investment Bank by a future incoming Labour administration. With a government procurement policy that both encourages open source and co-operatives, the kernel of a new worker co-operative sector could emerge. Were economic and social circumstances to further deteriorate into chaos and unemployment, this sector could eventually become crucially significant, signposting a better way of doing things in the future.
Policy areas: Co-operative development
Tags for this article: Carl Rowlands, worker co-operatives

Is there a lack of strong narratives and appealing meaningful visions? Is the UK culturally less prepared to go there; too tied up in 16thC-19thC ‘prince and the pauper’ narratives and 70s and 80s counter-cultural narratives: father-in-laws burnt by the anger of shop-floor politics of the generation above and who step back in disdain at both the vain dreaming spires aspirations of working classes and the often twisted primitivism of academics and liberal arts? Do we need to market the idea; re-package it? Perhaps different ideas for different people? The Disney history suggests the fairy-tale of the prince and pauper is one starting place? Or Clause 4; part IV in the old words: a ‘clause 4 lifestyle’ is another I’ve floated before but hasn’t caught on! And I’ve hybridised it with Gro Haarlem Brundtland’s definition of sustainable development?But is that too politically-geeky? Perhaps you can harness the crafting and self-sufficiency dreams behind the popularity of Victorian Farm Kirsty’s Homemade Home and River cottage? Perhaps interest in all these qualities behind our food can be re-grown with reference to origins of the Cooperative retailer? Or perhaps not? To those worried by Cooperative structure and appearance nowadays then Suma is not as ‘out there’ as it once appeared to larger sections of society! But going back to the original reasons for The Coop is not a bad idea in these days of multiple concerns about food and goods supply!? Discover and tread the pioneer paths again! This could widen out into other sectors of supply – or be done holistically; both would be robust beginnings! Lessen the risk associated with property development as represented by Grand Designs and Homes Under The Hammer? Cooperative building schemes have been done and not taken really but why? Are we all too different to see eye to eye? I suppose you need a strong appealing vision!
* Gro Harlem Brundtland
I would be interested in finding out more about worker co-operatives. Where can I find further information?
Many Thanks
Co-operatives UK – http://www.uk.coop – would be a good place to start as the main network for worker co-ops.
Kathy, you raise a lot of interesting points here, I really like your points about the primitivism of academia contrasting with the dreaming spires of the working class. Often things aren’t as they seem. My gut instinct is that re-marketing the idea is fine, but is best undertaken by the emergence of positive examples. As you say, there is massive scope for worker co-operatives in the food sector, as indicated by the picture of Suma Wholefoods attached to this article. I also agree that the ‘Arts and Crafts’ approach is also undergoing something of a revival of interest, and with youth unemployment at such high levels, nobody should be afraid of association with traditional skills. Most importantly, worker co-ops with strong values should be seen as delivering – delivering decent work and empowerment to a large number of people. I strongly believe that to get to this position, a new wave of worker co-ops – which is being envisaged by many in the Occupy movement – will need the support and assistance of government, the existing retail co-operatives and everyone sympathetic. For these forms to emerge as the main form of 21st century incubator – as I believe they should – it will require 2 things in short supply: time and space.